2.3 sec in total
109 ms
1.8 sec
437 ms
Click here to check amazing W 1 4 Applitrack content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about w1-4.applitrack.com
Applicant Tracking Software: A Recruiting & Hiring Solution Applicant Tracking empowers you to reclaim your time and gain insights that help you
Visit w1-4.applitrack.comWe analyzed W1-4.applitrack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 109 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
w1-4.applitrack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value19.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.9 s
1/100
10%
Value3,780 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.189
65/100
15%
Value26.8 s
0/100
10%
109 ms
1024 ms
887 ms
889 ms
857 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original W1-4.applitrack.com, 6% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.bizible.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Page.frontlineeducation.com.
Page size can be reduced by 230.6 kB (13%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of W1-4.applitrack.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 743.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 185.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 185.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. W 1 4 Applitrack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 16.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 28.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. W1-4.applitrack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.5 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (76%)
96
23
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of W 1 4 Applitrack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
109 ms
gtm.js
1024 ms
kchz3obam5
887 ms
HvmuG8emKTx3p5RGc8veg.js
889 ms
bizible.js
857 ms
analytics.bundle.js
892 ms
resource-center.css
37 ms
style.min.css
58 ms
ctt-module-design.css
104 ms
image-map-pro.min.css
114 ms
map.css
115 ms
dashicons.min.css
139 ms
style.css
133 ms
FE-bootstrap.css
161 ms
FE-bootstrap-theme.css
128 ms
Animate.css
139 ms
FE-MKTO-Styles.css
142 ms
FE-Hannah.css
157 ms
FE-Geoff.css
166 ms
FE-Jake.css
165 ms
buttons.css
164 ms
accessibility.css
163 ms
faqs.css
178 ms
header-b2b.css
190 ms
jquery.min.js
842 ms
acf.min.js
191 ms
script.js
184 ms
x9rkvuxg3n.jsonp
844 ms
E-v1.js
858 ms
forms2.min.js
1116 ms
E-v1.js
858 ms
clipboard.min.js
843 ms
script.js
184 ms
script.js
168 ms
script.js
171 ms
script.js
166 ms
js-error-log.js
170 ms
pintra-redirect.js
187 ms
docReady.js
164 ms
view.min.js
166 ms
resources.js
190 ms
ctt-script.js
168 ms
image-map-pro.min.js
207 ms
slick.min.js
169 ms
sticky.min.js
175 ms
script.min.js
177 ms
bootstrap.min_1.js
175 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
171 ms
debug.addIndicators.min.js
176 ms
TweenMax.min.js
191 ms
css
753 ms
css
771 ms
css
776 ms
css
775 ms
css
778 ms
css
777 ms
css
777 ms
animation.gsap.min.js
176 ms
flexibility.js
181 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
175 ms
jquery.cookie.js
173 ms
jquery.sticky.js
173 ms
tracker.js
165 ms
placeholders.min.js
172 ms
wow.min.js
172 ms
custom.js
161 ms
footer.js
161 ms
page.js
163 ms
mega-navigation.js
172 ms
utm-based-actions.js
170 ms
search-ajax.js
158 ms
helpful.js
166 ms
clarity.js
137 ms
wmep65kbfdrk.js
232 ms
logo-light.svg
223 ms
logo-dark.svg
214 ms
Applicant-Tracking-HeroImage.png
236 ms
recruiting-screen-scaled.webp
218 ms
Less-time-2.svg
213 ms
Clock-3.svg
213 ms
Gear-2.svg
220 ms
Clipboard-Check.svg
231 ms
Cycle.svg
218 ms
Talent-Mgt-1-1.svg
219 ms
Reporting-Integrations-1.svg
245 ms
Position-Mgt-1.svg
247 ms
gear.svg
243 ms
9-19-hcm_blog_feat_graphic-720x462.png
256 ms
A-Match-Made-in-Heaven-Blog_feat_Graphic-720x462.png
252 ms
AASPA-Podcast-Post-Blog_feat_Graphic-720x462.png
267 ms
20-Mile-Radius-Blog_feat_Graphic-720x462.png
293 ms
student-privacy-pledge.png
274 ms
lato-regular.woff
163 ms
font
117 ms
lato-semibold.woff
168 ms
lato-bold.woff
184 ms
KarbonSlabStencil-Regular.woff
200 ms
lato-italic.woff
200 ms
lato-mediumitalic.woff
200 ms
lato-lightitalic.ttf
201 ms
lato-thinitalic.woff
201 ms
lato-hairlineitalic.woff
205 ms
lato-semibolditalic.woff
223 ms
lato-bolditalic.woff
223 ms
lato-blackitalic.woff
229 ms
wp-polyfill-importmap.min.js
140 ms
ipv
30 ms
u
30 ms
update.min.js
53 ms
xdc.js
31 ms
w1-4.applitrack.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
w1-4.applitrack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
w1-4.applitrack.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise W1-4.applitrack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that W1-4.applitrack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
w1-4.applitrack.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of W 1 4 Applitrack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: