9.1 sec in total
1.1 sec
6.6 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing We Blog AV Comparatives content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about weblog.av-comparatives.info
Our latest stories, media coverage, and opinions of security leaders.
Visit weblog.av-comparatives.infoWe analyzed Weblog.av-comparatives.info page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
weblog.av-comparatives.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value1,660 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.376
28/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
1094 ms
450 ms
676 ms
670 ms
1127 ms
Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Weblog.av-comparatives.info, 33% (40 requests) were made to Weblog.av-comparatives.org and 16% (20 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Weblog.av-comparatives.org.
Page size can be reduced by 734.9 kB (35%)
2.1 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Weblog.av-comparatives.info main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. We Blog AV Comparatives images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 338.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 338.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 240.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weblog.av-comparatives.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 240.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (49%)
119
61
The browser has sent 119 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of We Blog AV Comparatives. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
weblog.av-comparatives.info
1094 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
450 ms
cli-style.css
676 ms
postratings-css.css
670 ms
foundation.min.css
1127 ms
font-awesome.min.css
790 ms
photoswipe.css
687 ms
flexslider.css
674 ms
responsive-tables.css
915 ms
style.css
1148 ms
jquery.js
1301 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
926 ms
cookielawinfo.js
1030 ms
modernizr.foundation.js
1168 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1253 ms
main.js
1248 ms
in.js
30 ms
wpsite-follow-us-badges.css
1308 ms
postratings-js.js
1309 ms
jquery.foundation.navigation.js
1309 ms
jquery.foundation.buttons.js
1575 ms
jquery.foundation.topbar.js
1587 ms
jquery.foundation.tooltips.js
1587 ms
klass.min.js
1588 ms
code.photoswipe.jquery-3.0.5.min.js
1887 ms
responsive-tables.js
1588 ms
app.js
1697 ms
mobile-menu.js
1695 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1712 ms
atrk.js
269 ms
css
55 ms
avc_logo2.png
996 ms
cropped-header.jpg
413 ms
jjjj-266x200.png
964 ms
survey_mockup-266x200.png
998 ms
2015-266x200.jpg
960 ms
prot_dec_2015-266x200.png
999 ms
lego-568039_960_720-266x200.jpg
992 ms
agreement-survey-scale-3-1236576-639x426-266x200.jpg
1005 ms
eicar-trusted-security-lab-266x200.png
1005 ms
msprev-266x200.png
1212 ms
widgets.js
121 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1039 ms
atrk.gif
110 ms
all.js
765 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
212 ms
overlay.png
766 ms
test.png
153 ms
rating_over.gif
748 ms
button.65b4bc8f0d6592fdc51d322b3f197660.js
325 ms
timeline.5d8406ab2e764a871ed41bd9aa0b693f.js
372 ms
xdrpc.html
212 ms
319 ms
xd_arbiter.php
366 ms
xd_arbiter.php
744 ms
syndication
176 ms
346565007179399168
378 ms
follow_button.64a917b4a230f163048902c783e1530f.en.html
116 ms
followcompany
167 ms
info.json
99 ms
css
112 ms
anonymoususerspace
25 ms
js
120 ms
css
188 ms
js
264 ms
sprite_connect_v15.png
77 ms
proxy.jpg
629 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
81 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
120 ms
asAHjRID_normal.png
432 ms
827b906f55e8f62876615f422d0eee21_normal.jpeg
450 ms
EEh6rq-g_normal.png
480 ms
3R5Bc2m4_normal.png
557 ms
qvvbsidG_normal.jpg
557 ms
h33ix_6H_normal.jpeg
580 ms
FxFnoOFA_normal.jpg
586 ms
4radNZuI_normal.jpeg
589 ms
c6b5f8b663f6bbe9fd9cca445c93e505_normal.jpeg
589 ms
LSWXvsf-_normal.jpg
588 ms
-qb8hOTy_normal.jpg
588 ms
8ad36ea11391fb26266c1088db119030_normal.png
625 ms
L4NxztZv_normal.png
627 ms
sde0GxNg_normal.jpeg
628 ms
_I-Bmu36_normal.jpg
626 ms
CeQIs0zW4AArHti.jpg:small
648 ms
CeKcqPtUEAAGwcM.jpg:small
830 ms
CeGBBy7UsAAFmxQ.jpg:small
888 ms
CeGBBopUAAAu35t.jpg:small
909 ms
CeF-uafW8AAU2ud.jpg:small
662 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
357 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
351 ms
follow.php
307 ms
page.php
439 ms
CiVxVZUu1dU.js
632 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
444 ms
proxy.jpg
184 ms
SAb9vLtZAm_.css
220 ms
Dn3OyIuCXv-.css
234 ms
6bIl72b-rkY.js
454 ms
TZLM7ADKFJh.js
502 ms
nw0sMxy_KfY.js
453 ms
Bzragvcyti8.js
539 ms
abDdM40BwfW.js
553 ms
In4aku49oAV.js
605 ms
jot.html
33 ms
293724_10151416841325354_670888395_n.jpg
456 ms
264647_10150701373900354_7484313_n.jpg
542 ms
12314045_1672731006302256_353832290549169873_n.jpg
630 ms
1958183_1526080047694191_3241179666613409017_n.jpg
751 ms
1240581_388499394611490_1900326570_n.jpg
760 ms
164340_192123097465770_4433054_n.jpg
749 ms
10399797_183291615393681_6517878794531110953_n.jpg
749 ms
10568908_177745762611560_5003149422598766811_n.jpg
760 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
128 ms
WTZ_Jhk-ooC.png
128 ms
css;base64,
4 ms
arN8Qs-9cbz.css
71 ms
RlXTAvYCdcl.png
73 ms
R9GKCzjAnbk.js
106 ms
AWWjhOengNF.js
105 ms
YnSasnyq68i.js
107 ms
kQf_jlUv-kX.js
105 ms
weblog.av-comparatives.info accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
weblog.av-comparatives.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
weblog.av-comparatives.info SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weblog.av-comparatives.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Weblog.av-comparatives.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
weblog.av-comparatives.info
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of We Blog AV Comparatives. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: