Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

202u.com

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

481 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

103 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing 202 U content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 202u.com

Visit 202u.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 202u.com page load time and found that the first response time was 481 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

202u.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

202u.com

481 ms

index.html

445 ms

575 ms

cmp_standalone.min.js

550 ms

bootstrap.min.css

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 202u.com, 30% (11 requests) were made to Nominalia.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (745 ms) relates to the external source Trk.nominalia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.5 kB (21%)

Content Size

115.2 kB

After Optimization

90.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 202u.com main page is 115.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 94.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 423 B

  • Original 853 B
  • After minification 837 B
  • After compression 430 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 423 B or 50% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 202 U images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 94.8 kB
  • After minification 94.8 kB
  • After compression 81.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 10.4 kB

  • Original 15.5 kB
  • After minification 15.5 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 202u.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (77%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 202 U. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

202u.com accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

202u.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

202u.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 202u.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that 202u.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 202 U. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: