Access 221e.com. IMU, AI & Sensor Fusion

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value35.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,020 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.5 s

1/100

10%

221e.com

254 ms

221e.com

6073 ms

www.221e.com

3810 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

467 ms

style.min.css

562 ms

Our browser made a total of 132 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (117 requests) were addressed to the original 221e.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.iubenda.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.1 sec) belongs to the original domain 221e.com.

Content Size

9.5 MB

After Optimization

8.6 MB

In fact, the total size of 221e.com main page is 9.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 347.9 kB

Original 401.6 kB
After minification 396.7 kB
After compression 53.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 347.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 573.8 kB

Original 8.4 MB
After minification 7.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 221 E images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

Original 557.5 kB
After minification 557.5 kB
After compression 542.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

Original 191.2 kB
After minification 189.2 kB
After compression 185.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 221e.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

118

After Optimization

The browser has sent 118 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 221 E. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.