Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

232analyzer.com

FREE RS232 RS485 RS422 TTL Serial Port Protocol Analyzer Monitor Terminal Software

Page Load Speed

21.7 sec in total

First Response

20 ms

Resources Loaded

21.2 sec

Page Rendered

486 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing 232 Analyzer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 232analyzer.com

Award-winning RS232 RS485 RS422 TTL Serial Port Monitor Terminal Analyzer Software, Win 8/7/Vista/XP supported.

Visit 232analyzer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 232analyzer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 20 ms and then it took 21.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

232analyzer.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,610 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.0 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

232analyzer.com

20 ms

ajaxify.scssb2a3.css

6 ms

font-awesome.minb2a3.css

9 ms

animateb2a3.css

11 ms

owl-carouselb2a3.css

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (95 requests) were addressed to the original 232analyzer.com, 5% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) relates to the external source Admin.cym.bio.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 771.0 kB (13%)

Content Size

5.9 MB

After Optimization

5.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 232analyzer.com main page is 5.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 84.7 kB

  • Original 102.6 kB
  • After minification 90.3 kB
  • After compression 17.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 186.8 kB

  • Original 5.0 MB
  • After minification 4.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 232 Analyzer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 252.7 kB

  • Original 474.4 kB
  • After minification 356.0 kB
  • After compression 221.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 252.7 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 246.8 kB

  • Original 353.6 kB
  • After minification 325.2 kB
  • After compression 106.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 232analyzer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 246.8 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (34%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

67

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 232 Analyzer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

232analyzer.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

232analyzer.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

232analyzer.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 232analyzer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 232analyzer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 232 Analyzer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: