Access 93ft.com. 93ft - Branding, Web Design & Interiors Agency Sheffield

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value56.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

93ft.com

306 ms

93ft.com

906 ms

script.js

45 ms

screen.css

301 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

374 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original 93ft.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn-cookieyes.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain 93ft.com.

Content Size

18.4 MB

After Optimization

18.0 MB

In fact, the total size of 93ft.com main page is 18.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 18.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

Original 39.1 kB
After minification 31.8 kB
After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.3 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 152.8 kB

Original 18.0 MB
After minification 17.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 93 Ft images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 120.4 kB

Original 206.0 kB
After minification 194.7 kB
After compression 85.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.4 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 104.7 kB

Original 120.6 kB
After minification 119.0 kB
After compression 15.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 93ft.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 104.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 93 Ft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.