Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

adagio.com

Loose Tea | Buy Online | Free shipping over $49

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

325 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

573 ms

About Website

Welcome to adagio.com homepage info - get ready to check Adagio best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about adagio.com

Shop online for gourmet loose teas sourced directly from the artisan farmers who tender them. All types of loose leaf teas available. Free shipping !

Visit adagio.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Adagio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 325 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

adagio.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,440 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.3 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.adagio.com

325 ms

style_2024.css

67 ms

css

45 ms

jquery.min.js

37 ms

javascript_full.js

150 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Adagio.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Google.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (990 ms) belongs to the original domain Adagio.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 90.0 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Adagio.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 79.2 kB

  • Original 115.2 kB
  • After minification 109.3 kB
  • After compression 36.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Adagio images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 439.2 kB
  • After minification 439.2 kB
  • After compression 434.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 24.6 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB
  • After compression 20.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Adagio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (48%)

Requests Now

99

After Optimization

51

The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adagio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

adagio.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

adagio.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

adagio.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adagio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Adagio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Adagio. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: