Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

adamsonford.com

WINLIVE4D ?,! Se-worht it apa Main Slot Gacor di Winlive4D? 19 Review Maxwin Malam ini

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

28 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

756 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Adamsonford content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about adamsonford.com

WINLIVE4D! Review Kemenangan MAXWIN Malam ini. Banyak Pemain Judi Online Mencari Situs Terpercaya, Winlive4D Sangat Worth it untuk Bermain Slot Gacor dengan Mudah Mencari Menang

Visit adamsonford.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Adamsonford.com page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

adamsonford.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

adamsonford.com

28 ms

stiversfordofbirmingham.com

516 ms

t.js

518 ms

fbevents.js

465 ms

pix-aop-auto.js

517 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Adamsonford.com, 21% (14 requests) were made to Images.remorainc.com and 19% (13 requests) were made to R.remorainc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Api.userway.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 908.8 kB (36%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Adamsonford.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 902.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 184.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 902.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Adamsonford images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 341.7 kB
  • After minification 341.7 kB
  • After compression 337.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (34%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adamsonford. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

adamsonford.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

adamsonford.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

adamsonford.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adamsonford.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Adamsonford.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Adamsonford. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: