Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 46

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

aerospacedefensereview.com

Aerospace and Defense Review: Business Technology Magazine

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

135 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

819 ms

About Website

Visit aerospacedefensereview.com now to see the best up-to-date Aerospace Defense Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about aerospacedefensereview.com

Aerospace and Defense Review is a leading print and digital magazine delivering business & technology news, insights shaping the aerospace and defense industry.

Visit aerospacedefensereview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Aerospacedefensereview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aerospacedefensereview.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,840 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.561

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aerospacedefensereview.com

135 ms

aerospacedefensereview.com

267 ms

www.aerospacedefensereview.com

811 ms

bootstrap.min.css

131 ms

animate.css

183 ms

Our browser made a total of 133 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (113 requests) were addressed to the original Aerospacedefensereview.com, 4% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (811 ms) belongs to the original domain Aerospacedefensereview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 558.3 kB (15%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Aerospacedefensereview.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 133.6 kB

  • Original 159.5 kB
  • After minification 155.2 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 40.0 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aerospace Defense Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 338.5 kB

  • Original 893.9 kB
  • After minification 890.4 kB
  • After compression 555.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 338.5 kB or 38% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 46.2 kB

  • Original 105.0 kB
  • After minification 79.9 kB
  • After compression 58.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aerospacedefensereview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (39%)

Requests Now

115

After Optimization

70

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aerospace Defense Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

aerospacedefensereview.com accessibility score

46

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

aerospacedefensereview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

aerospacedefensereview.com SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aerospacedefensereview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Aerospacedefensereview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Aerospace Defense Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: