2.2 sec in total
156 ms
1.7 sec
411 ms
Visit aestek.net now to see the best up-to-date AESTEK content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about aestek.net
Whether your needs are prototyping, quick-turn electronic assembly or medium-sized PCB runs, our full-time staff of experienced professionals are on-hand to provide support.
Visit aestek.netWe analyzed Aestek.net page load time and found that the first response time was 156 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
aestek.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value1,360 ms
16/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
156 ms
7 ms
111 ms
155 ms
398 ms
Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Aestek.net, 63% (10 requests) were made to Storage.googleapis.com and 13% (2 requests) were made to Wzuk.blob.core.windows.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (605 ms) relates to the external source Wzuk.blob.core.windows.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (55%)
3.4 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Aestek.net main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. AESTEK images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.6 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 125.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aestek.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 125.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (25%)
12
9
The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AESTEK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
aestek.net accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
aestek.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
aestek.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aestek.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Aestek.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
aestek.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of AESTEK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: