Access agedum.com. Agedum. Consultoría y Auditoría Interna de normas ISO en Málaga

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,790 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.178

68/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

agedum.com

790 ms

module.css

255 ms

default.css

386 ms

skin.css

389 ms

container.css

260 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Agedum.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Incibe.es. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Agedum.com.

Content Size

681.9 kB

After Optimization

460.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Agedum.com main page is 681.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 401.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 50.4 kB

Original 64.2 kB
After minification 54.6 kB
After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

Original 401.9 kB
After minification 391.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Agedum images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 113.7 kB

Original 164.6 kB
After minification 155.5 kB
After compression 50.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 113.7 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 46.1 kB

Original 51.2 kB
After minification 35.1 kB
After compression 5.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Agedum.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.1 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Agedum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.