Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

agret.com

Solgim Agret

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

271 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

457 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Agret content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about agret.com

Votre agence immobilière Solgim Agret vous propose son catalogue d'annonces immobilières pour trouver le bien immobilier qui vous correspond. Nous vous conseillons et vous accompagnons dans votre proj...

Visit agret.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Agret.com page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

agret.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,610 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.267

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

agret.com

271 ms

www.agret.com

1308 ms

style.min.1671789819.css

595 ms

config.1643882766.js

90 ms

Master.1711530908.js

760 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Agret.com, 52% (13 requests) were made to Css.agret.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Js.agret.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Agret.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 490.1 kB (53%)

Content Size

932.2 kB

After Optimization

442.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Agret.com main page is 932.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 518.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 488.0 kB

  • Original 518.6 kB
  • After minification 487.8 kB
  • After compression 30.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 488.0 kB or 94% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 358.1 kB
  • After minification 356.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Agret images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 59 B

  • Original 55.4 kB
  • After minification 55.4 kB
  • After compression 55.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Agret.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (47%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Agret. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

agret.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

agret.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

agret.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Agret.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Agret.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Agret. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: