Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

aliff.in

Best Overseas Education Consultants | Consultancy For Foreign Education

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

403 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

86 ms

About Website

Welcome to aliff.in homepage info - get ready to check Aliff best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about aliff.in

Aliff Overseas is the ultimate solution for students who want to join top-ranking international universities without wasting time or spending a fortune. Visit the website today!

Visit aliff.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Aliff.in page load time and found that the first response time was 403 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aliff.in performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value37.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value46.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value37.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,380 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.054

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value54.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aliff.in

403 ms

aliff.in

820 ms

vue-multiselect.min.css

119 ms

css2

121 ms

aos.css

194 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Aliff.in, 17% (9 requests) were made to Razorpay.com and 17% (9 requests) were made to Api.razorpay.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Aliff.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.0 MB (70%)

Content Size

5.8 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Aliff.in main page is 5.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 5.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 32.6 kB

  • Original 38.7 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 3.5 MB

  • Original 5.2 MB
  • After minification 5.2 MB
  • After compression 1.7 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.5 MB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 436.4 kB

  • Original 516.1 kB
  • After minification 516.1 kB
  • After compression 79.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aliff.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 436.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (53%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aliff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

aliff.in accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

aliff.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

aliff.in SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aliff.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aliff.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Aliff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: