Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

alliancecost.com

Cost Reduction Company - Strategic Sourcing Services - Alliance Cost Containment

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

869 ms

Page Rendered

449 ms

About Website

Welcome to alliancecost.com homepage info - get ready to check Alliance Cost best content right away, or after learning these important things about alliancecost.com

Alliance Cost Containment offers strategic sourcing services to help businesses increase profits. Contact us to see how a cost reduction company could help your business!

Visit alliancecost.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Alliancecost.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

alliancecost.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,150 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.072

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

alliancecost.com

49 ms

alliancecost.com

73 ms

1724250487-css58bd8864ddb1a8c55862fa66cf655fe15621b99d2f889d93b82361dd0b456.css

20 ms

1724250487-cssbbab8eda18e0ba92ac3ed4ace7bfb487cf7c86b71fcee233904284a400170.css

35 ms

1724250487-css3c516751eb30b460f9cbd79ffd59249abad4e7b14d81a6d8ec919ca2138fd.css

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 131 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (104 requests) were addressed to the original Alliancecost.com, 16% (21 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (388 ms) belongs to the original domain Alliancecost.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 252.1 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Alliancecost.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 158.2 kB

  • Original 189.6 kB
  • After minification 189.4 kB
  • After compression 31.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 158.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 326 B

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Alliance Cost images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 88.5 kB

  • Original 496.8 kB
  • After minification 496.8 kB
  • After compression 408.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.5 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 352.1 kB
  • After minification 351.1 kB
  • After compression 347.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Alliancecost.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (83%)

Requests Now

104

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Alliance Cost. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 44 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

alliancecost.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

alliancecost.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

alliancecost.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Alliancecost.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Alliancecost.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Alliance Cost. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: