Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

alphabet.es

Your mobility. Made easy. | Alphabet.com

Page Load Speed

977 ms in total

First Response

195 ms

Resources Loaded

723 ms

Page Rendered

59 ms

About Website

Welcome to alphabet.es homepage info - get ready to check Alphabet best content for Spain right away, or after learning these important things about alphabet.es

Visit alphabet.es

Key Findings

We analyzed Alphabet.es page load time and found that the first response time was 195 ms and then it took 782 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

alphabet.es performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,800 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

alphabet.es

195 ms

515 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Alphabet.es, 50% (1 request) were made to Alphabet.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (515 ms) relates to the external source Alphabet.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 355.0 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

768.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Alphabet.es main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 551.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 110 B
  • After minification 110 B
  • After compression 93 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17 B or 15% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 22.3 kB

  • Original 551.3 kB
  • After minification 529.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Alphabet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

  • Original 69.9 kB
  • After minification 69.9 kB
  • After compression 47.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 310.7 kB

  • Original 502.2 kB
  • After minification 502.0 kB
  • After compression 191.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Alphabet.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 310.7 kB or 62% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

alphabet.es accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

alphabet.es best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

alphabet.es SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Alphabet.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Alphabet.es main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Alphabet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: