Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

alrmal.net

شركة الرمال الفرنسية - أفضل متجر للتسوق عبر الإنترنت, اجهزة الليزر ومواد التجميل

Page Load Speed

7.9 sec in total

First Response

658 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

3 sec

About Website

Visit alrmal.net now to see the best up-to-date Alrmal content for Morocco and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about alrmal.net

شركة الرمال الفرنسية - متجر لبيع مواد التجميل وأجهزة الليزر. هدايا قيمة بيع اونلاين توصيل لجميع الدول - شحن سريع تسديد امن تسوق الان

Visit alrmal.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Alrmal.net page load time and found that the first response time was 658 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

alrmal.net performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.6 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.alrmal.net

658 ms

css

41 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

360 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

445 ms

pinterest-for-woocommerce-pins.min.css

530 ms

Our browser made a total of 157 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Alrmal.net, 57% (90 requests) were made to Usercontent.one and 38% (59 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Usercontent.one.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 794.3 kB (39%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Alrmal.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 794.0 kB

  • Original 877.2 kB
  • After minification 855.9 kB
  • After compression 83.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 794.0 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 242 B

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Alrmal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 66 B

  • Original 11.4 kB
  • After minification 11.4 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 91 (59%)

Requests Now

155

After Optimization

64

The browser has sent 155 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Alrmal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 84 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

alrmal.net accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

alrmal.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

alrmal.net SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    AR

  • Language Claimed

    AR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Alrmal.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Alrmal.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Alrmal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: