Access appedology.com. Top App Development Company in USA

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.2 s

0/100

10%

appedology.com

91 ms

appedology.com

302 ms

css

60 ms

css

80 ms

bootstrap.min.css

208 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Appedology.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (364 ms) belongs to the original domain Appedology.com.

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Appedology.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 94.2 kB

Original 116.5 kB
After minification 104.2 kB
After compression 22.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 231.2 kB

Original 1.7 MB
After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, App Edology needs image optimization as it can save up to 231.2 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 399.8 kB

Original 860.5 kB
After minification 856.6 kB
After compression 460.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 399.8 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 446.5 kB

Original 504.5 kB
After minification 462.4 kB
After compression 58.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Appedology.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 446.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of App Edology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.