Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

architectural.uk.com

Architectural Services | Architectural Design Service | Hedgehog Lane, Haslemere, UK

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

136 ms

Resources Loaded

897 ms

Page Rendered

52 ms

About Website

Visit architectural.uk.com now to see the best up-to-date Architectural content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about architectural.uk.com

Architectural Services are based in Haslemere and provide a complete managed architectural design service for your extension, loft conversion, interior remodel or new build.

Visit architectural.uk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Architectural.uk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 949 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

architectural.uk.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.architectural.uk.com

136 ms

minified.js

30 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

72 ms

thunderbolt-commons.81e79c4a.bundle.min.js

134 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Architectural.uk.com, 31% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (333 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 666.5 kB (52%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

622.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Architectural.uk.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 813.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 650.7 kB

  • Original 813.6 kB
  • After minification 811.8 kB
  • After compression 162.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 650.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 12.2 kB

  • Original 231.0 kB
  • After minification 218.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Architectural images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 244.2 kB
  • After minification 244.2 kB
  • After compression 240.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (42%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Architectural. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

architectural.uk.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

architectural.uk.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

architectural.uk.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Architectural.uk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Architectural.uk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Architectural. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: