Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

armstrongstudios.com

Product Photography | Baltimore Maryland | Armstrong Studio

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

524 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

388 ms

About Website

Visit armstrongstudios.com now to see the best up-to-date Armstrong Studio S content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about armstrongstudios.com

Armstrong Studio provides creative table-top and product photography for companies ready to elevate their brands. A broad overview of high quality product photography is presented here.

Visit armstrongstudios.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Armstrongstudios.com page load time and found that the first response time was 524 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

armstrongstudios.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.armstrongstudios.com

524 ms

client-e3a5233148baca098fbf689a76ca9a7d632a5ff510b7bbdb2c561044f07cf91b.css

125 ms

top-0a916bd83e377a5ee34e8c4ea271533765477cbe61764d1f0165a375cbe3b371.css

188 ms

lexington.css

193 ms

1760.css

207 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Armstrongstudios.com, 32% (12 requests) were made to Fast.clickbooq.com and 19% (7 requests) were made to Static.clickbooq.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (524 ms) belongs to the original domain Armstrongstudios.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 188.6 kB (33%)

Content Size

578.3 kB

After Optimization

389.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Armstrongstudios.com main page is 578.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 239.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 187.3 kB

  • Original 239.9 kB
  • After minification 231.0 kB
  • After compression 52.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 187.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 190.8 kB
  • After minification 190.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Armstrong Studio S images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11 B

  • Original 138.2 kB
  • After minification 138.2 kB
  • After compression 138.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 9.4 kB
  • After minification 8.9 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Armstrongstudios.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (78%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Armstrong Studio S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

armstrongstudios.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

armstrongstudios.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

armstrongstudios.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Armstrongstudios.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Armstrongstudios.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Armstrong Studio S. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: