Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

arscom.hr

Adobe Portfolio | Build your own personalized website

Page Load Speed

784 ms in total

First Response

328 ms

Resources Loaded

406 ms

Page Rendered

50 ms

About Website

Visit arscom.hr now to see the best up-to-date Arscom content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about arscom.hr

Quickly and simply build a personalized website to showcase your creative work with Adobe Portfolio. Now included free with any Creative Cloud subscription.

Visit arscom.hr

Key Findings

We analyzed Arscom.hr page load time and found that the first response time was 328 ms and then it took 456 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arscom.hr performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

arscom.hr

328 ms

missing

25 ms

constants.js

3 ms

app.js

16 ms

nr-spa-1044.min.js

14 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Arscom.hr, 40% (2 requests) were made to Portfolio.adobe.com and 20% (1 request) were made to Pro2-ui-assets-s3-fy.myportfolio.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (328 ms) belongs to the original domain Arscom.hr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 13.6 kB (12%)

Content Size

115.1 kB

After Optimization

101.5 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Arscom.hr main page is 115.1 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 93.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 21.4 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 63% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 93.6 kB
  • After minification 93.6 kB
  • After compression 93.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arscom. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

arscom.hr accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

arscom.hr best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

arscom.hr SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arscom.hr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Arscom.hr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Arscom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: