Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

art1.ru

Тинькофф Промокоды — скидки, кэшбэк, акции, купоны, бонусы

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

824 ms

About Website

Visit art1.ru now to see the best up-to-date Art 1 content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about art1.ru

Ищите актуальные промокоды и скидочные купоны. Получайте выгоду от онлайн скидок и акций на популярные товары и услуги. Экономьте до 50% с кодами от Тинькофф Промокоды

Visit art1.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Art1.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

art1.ru performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

art1.ru

165 ms

promokod.tinkoff.ru

515 ms

promokod.tbank.ru

1269 ms

index.js

766 ms

entry.PlSKTwBf.css

261 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Art1.ru, 67% (26 requests) were made to Promokod.tbank.ru and 26% (10 requests) were made to Opis-cdn.tinkoffjournal.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Opis-cdn.tinkoffjournal.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 170.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Art1.ru main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 124.2 kB

  • Original 152.4 kB
  • After minification 151.8 kB
  • After compression 28.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 124.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 46.6 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Art 1 images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (21%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Art 1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

art1.ru accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

art1.ru best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

art1.ru SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Art1.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Art1.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Art 1. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: