Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

115 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

447 ms

About Website

Welcome to artefactbd.com homepage info - get ready to check Artefactbd best content for Bangladesh right away, or after learning these important things about artefactbd.com

Ncomputing Vcloudpoint Zero Client

Visit artefactbd.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Artefactbd.com page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

artefactbd.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,450 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.537

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.5 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.artefactbd.com

115 ms

javascript;base64,V2ViRm9udENvbmZpZz17Z29vZ2xlOntmYW1pbGllczpbIk9wZW4gU2FuczozMDAsMzAwaXRhbGljLDQwMCw0MDBpdGFsaWMsNjAwLDYwMGl0YWxpYyw3MDAsNzAwaXRhbGljLDgwMCw4MDBpdGFsaWMiLCJSYWxld2F5OjQwMCwxMDAsMjAwLDMwMCw1MDAsNjAwLDcwMCw4MDAsOTAwIiwiUm9ib3RvOjQwMCwxMDAsMTAwaXRhbGljLDMwMCwzMDBpdGFsaWMsNDAwaXRhbGljLDUwMCw1MDBpdGFsaWMsNzAwLDcwMGl0YWxpYyw5MDAsOTAwaXRhbGljIiwiRGFuY2luZyBTY3JpcHQ6NDAwLDcwMCIsIlJvYm90bzo0MDAiXX19O2lmKHR5cGVvZiBXZWJGb250PT09Im9iamVjdCImJnR5cGVvZiBXZWJGb250LmxvYWQ9PT0iZnVuY3Rpb24iKXtXZWJGb250LmxvYWQoV2ViRm9udENvbmZpZyl9

7 ms

webfontloader.min.js

100 ms

javascript;base64,aWYoIWRvY3VtZW50LmdldEVsZW1lbnRCeUlkKCdycy1wbHVnaW4tc2V0dGluZ3MtaW5saW5lLWNzcycpKXtkb2N1bWVudC53cml0ZSgiPHN0eWxlIGlkPSdycy1wbHVnaW4tc2V0dGluZ3MtaW5saW5lLWNzcycgdHlwZT0ndGV4dC9jc3MnPjwvc3R5bGU+Iil9

12 ms

king-hosting.css

97 ms

Our browser made a total of 173 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (102 requests) were addressed to the original Artefactbd.com, 19% (33 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (17 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Artefactbd.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 328.2 kB (16%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Artefactbd.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 160.4 kB

  • Original 198.8 kB
  • After minification 196.5 kB
  • After compression 38.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 43.3 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Artefactbd images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 332.5 kB
  • After minification 332.5 kB
  • After compression 284.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 76.3 kB

  • Original 271.9 kB
  • After minification 271.9 kB
  • After compression 195.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Artefactbd.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 76.3 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (63%)

Requests Now

112

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Artefactbd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

artefactbd.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

artefactbd.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

artefactbd.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Artefactbd.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Artefactbd.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Artefactbd. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: