Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

asmanuel.com

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

87 ms

About Website

Welcome to asmanuel.com homepage info - get ready to check Asmanuel best content right away, or after learning these important things about asmanuel.com

Visit asmanuel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Asmanuel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

asmanuel.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.asmanuel.com

1160 ms

tailwind.min.css

270 ms

all.min.css

449 ms

sp-scripts.min.js

359 ms

jquery.min.js

455 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Asmanuel.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Asmanuel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 177.8 kB (62%)

Content Size

287.9 kB

After Optimization

110.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Asmanuel.com main page is 287.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 116.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 4.8 kB
  • After minification 4.6 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 55.9 kB
  • After minification 48.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Asmanuel needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 74.7 kB

  • Original 111.2 kB
  • After minification 111.2 kB
  • After compression 36.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 74.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 92.1 kB

  • Original 116.0 kB
  • After minification 115.3 kB
  • After compression 24.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Asmanuel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 92.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Asmanuel. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

asmanuel.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Best Practices

asmanuel.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

asmanuel.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Asmanuel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Asmanuel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Asmanuel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: