Access attractive.co.il. Attractive – Creative B2B Agency for Tech Companies

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,630 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.1 s

0/100

10%

attractive.co.il

1405 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

560 ms

style.min.css

732 ms

classic-themes.min.css

466 ms

styles.css

419 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Attractive.co.il, 8% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Attractive.co.il.

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Attractive.co.il main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 94.6 kB

Original 106.9 kB
After minification 77.6 kB
After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.4 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 350.7 kB

Original 1.6 MB
After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Attractive needs image optimization as it can save up to 350.7 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 396.6 kB

Original 788.5 kB
After minification 788.5 kB
After compression 391.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 396.6 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 156.5 kB

Original 179.9 kB
After minification 179.2 kB
After compression 23.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Attractive.co.il needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 156.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Attractive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.