Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

auraphyll.com

Page Load Speed

14.3 sec in total

First Response

5.1 sec

Resources Loaded

8.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

About Website

Visit auraphyll.com now to see the best up-to-date Auraphyll content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about auraphyll.com

Visit auraphyll.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Auraphyll.com page load time and found that the first response time was 5.1 sec and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

auraphyll.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.08

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.9 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

auraphyll.com

5120 ms

offcanvas.css

182 ms

navmenu.css

184 ms

headerinfo.css

191 ms

rkit-navmenu.css

193 ms

Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (125 requests) were addressed to the original Auraphyll.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Auraphyll.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 296.5 kB (5%)

Content Size

6.0 MB

After Optimization

5.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Auraphyll.com main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 149.1 kB

  • Original 173.4 kB
  • After minification 158.7 kB
  • After compression 24.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 14.3 kB

  • Original 5.4 MB
  • After minification 5.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Auraphyll images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 84.9 kB

  • Original 337.2 kB
  • After minification 337.2 kB
  • After compression 252.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 84.9 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 48.2 kB

  • Original 137.0 kB
  • After minification 136.8 kB
  • After compression 88.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Auraphyll.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (64%)

Requests Now

126

After Optimization

45

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 126 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Auraphyll. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 42 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

auraphyll.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

auraphyll.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

auraphyll.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Auraphyll.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Auraphyll.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Auraphyll. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: