Access auric.consulting. Auric an XContent Company

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

38/100

10%

auric.consulting

64 ms

auric.consulting

2844 ms

siteground-optimizer-combined-css-e74cde8259cf033f0590672a62046007.css

23 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

11 ms

css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Auric.consulting, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Auric.consulting.

Content Size

385.5 kB

After Optimization

325.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Auric.consulting main page is 385.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 211.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 51.4 kB

Original 65.2 kB
After minification 64.7 kB
After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

Original 211.7 kB
After minification 203.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Auric images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 76 B

Original 69.2 kB
After minification 69.2 kB
After compression 69.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 221 B

Original 39.4 kB
After minification 39.4 kB
After compression 39.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Auric.consulting has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Auric. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.