Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

austinqualityfencestaining.com

Austin Quality Fence Staining | Professional Painting, Staining, Sealing, Pressure Washing | Austin TX Contractors

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

644 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

3.3 sec

About Website

Welcome to austinqualityfencestaining.com homepage info - get ready to check Austin Quality Fence Staining best content right away, or after learning these important things about austinqualityfencestaining.com

Austin Quality Fence Staining, Fence and Deck Staining, specializing in the cleaning, sealing and staining of wood fences and decks new or old. Professional Painters, Painting, Sealing, Staining Press...

Visit austinqualityfencestaining.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Austinqualityfencestaining.com page load time and found that the first response time was 644 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

austinqualityfencestaining.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.07

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value52.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

austinqualityfencestaining.com

644 ms

frontend.min.css

79 ms

css

93 ms

animations.min.css

84 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Austinqualityfencestaining.com, 10% (11 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 10% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (695 ms) belongs to the original domain Austinqualityfencestaining.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (14%)

Content Size

20.8 MB

After Optimization

17.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Austinqualityfencestaining.com main page is 20.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 20.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 161.5 kB

  • Original 191.8 kB
  • After minification 188.1 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 161.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 2.6 MB

  • Original 20.1 MB
  • After minification 17.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Austin Quality Fence Staining needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.6 MB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 41.9 kB

  • Original 290.1 kB
  • After minification 284.5 kB
  • After compression 248.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 93.5 kB

  • Original 245.2 kB
  • After minification 242.3 kB
  • After compression 151.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Austinqualityfencestaining.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 93.5 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (66%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Austin Quality Fence Staining. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

austinqualityfencestaining.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

austinqualityfencestaining.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

austinqualityfencestaining.com SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Austinqualityfencestaining.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Austinqualityfencestaining.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Austin Quality Fence Staining. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: