Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

axible.io

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

898 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

217 ms

About Website

Welcome to axible.io homepage info - get ready to check Axible best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about axible.io

Visit axible.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Axible.io page load time and found that the first response time was 898 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

axible.io performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

axible.io

898 ms

style.min.css

166 ms

style.min.css

167 ms

view.min.js

170 ms

wp-polyfill-importmap.min.js

92 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Axible.io and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (898 ms) belongs to the original domain Axible.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 69.8 kB (69%)

Content Size

101.4 kB

After Optimization

31.5 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Axible.io main page is 101.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 84.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 69.8 kB

  • Original 84.3 kB
  • After minification 82.8 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 24 B

  • Original 13.3 kB
  • After minification 13.3 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 32 B

  • Original 3.8 kB
  • After minification 3.8 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Axible.io has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Axible. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

axible.io accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

axible.io best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

axible.io SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Axible.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Axible.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Axible. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: