Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

ghostbar.ath.cx

GitHub - eserre/ghostbar.ath.cx: Source-code for ghostbar.ath.cx

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

901 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

3.4 sec

About Website

Welcome to ghostbar.ath.cx homepage info - get ready to check Ghostbar Ath best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about ghostbar.ath.cx

Source-code for ghostbar.ath.cx. Contribute to eserre/ghostbar.ath.cx development by creating an account on GitHub.

Visit ghostbar.ath.cx

Key Findings

We analyzed Ghostbar.ath.cx page load time and found that the first response time was 901 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ghostbar.ath.cx performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,590 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ghostbar.ath.cx

901 ms

light-5178aee0ee76.css

503 ms

dark-217d4f9c8e70.css

501 ms

primer-1c02b272deb7.css

583 ms

global-e1c43be717dd.css

1004 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ghostbar.ath.cx, 2% (1 request) were made to Github.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Github.githubassets.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 161.1 kB (53%)

Content Size

301.1 kB

After Optimization

140.0 kB

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ghostbar.ath.cx main page is 301.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 184.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 156.0 kB

  • Original 184.4 kB
  • After minification 174.6 kB
  • After compression 28.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 116.8 kB
  • After minification 112.4 kB
  • After compression 111.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ghostbar.ath.cx has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (95%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ghostbar Ath. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

ghostbar.ath.cx accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ghostbar.ath.cx best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ghostbar.ath.cx SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ghostbar.ath.cx can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ghostbar.ath.cx main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ghostbar Ath. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: