Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

126 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

68 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Links Aspiration content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about links.aspiration.com

Visit links.aspiration.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Links.aspiration.com page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

links.aspiration.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,200 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.053

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aspiration.com

126 ms

aspiration.com

263 ms

www.aspiration.com

306 ms

analytics.min.js

354 ms

gtm.js

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Links.aspiration.com, 12% (3 requests) were made to Aspiration.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (553 ms) relates to the external source Rebrand.aspiration.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.1 kB (6%)

Content Size

444.5 kB

After Optimization

416.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Links.aspiration.com main page is 444.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 406.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 26.3 kB

  • Original 37.4 kB
  • After minification 37.4 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 406.7 kB
  • After minification 406.7 kB
  • After compression 405.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 63 B

  • Original 324 B
  • After minification 324 B
  • After compression 261 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Links.aspiration.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63 B or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (78%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Links Aspiration. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

links.aspiration.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

links.aspiration.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

links.aspiration.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Links.aspiration.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Links.aspiration.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Links Aspiration. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: