3.7 sec in total
155 ms
3 sec
509 ms
Visit babiestotoddlers.com now to see the best up-to-date Babiestotoddlers content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about babiestotoddlers.com
Visit babiestotoddlers.comWe analyzed Babiestotoddlers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 155 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
babiestotoddlers.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value5.8 s
16/100
25%
Value5.3 s
57/100
10%
Value760 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
155 ms
1435 ms
163 ms
56 ms
135 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Babiestotoddlers.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Babiestotoddlers.com.
Page size can be reduced by 903.0 kB (30%)
3.0 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Babiestotoddlers.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 275.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Babiestotoddlers needs image optimization as it can save up to 275.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 309.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 309.4 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 237.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Babiestotoddlers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 237.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (60%)
65
26
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Babiestotoddlers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
babiestotoddlers.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
babiestotoddlers.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
babiestotoddlers.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Babiestotoddlers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Babiestotoddlers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
babiestotoddlers.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Babiestotoddlers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: