Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

babyinabag.com

Baby sleeping bags, also called baby sleep sacks for infants and toddlers.

Page Load Speed

755 ms in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

391 ms

Page Rendered

230 ms

About Website

Visit babyinabag.com now to see the best up-to-date Baby Inabag content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about babyinabag.com

Baby sleeping bags also called baby sleep sacks for infants and toddlers. The highest quality baby sleeping bags.

Visit babyinabag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Babyinabag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 621 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

babyinabag.com performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.091

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

babyinabag.com

134 ms

style.css

44 ms

ectcart.css

69 ms

flexslider.css

65 ms

jquery.js

113 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Babyinabag.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (135 ms) belongs to the original domain Babyinabag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 40.8 kB (12%)

Content Size

339.8 kB

After Optimization

299.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Babyinabag.com main page is 339.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 233.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 12.3 kB
  • After minification 9.9 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.5 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 233.5 kB
  • After minification 230.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Baby Inabag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

  • Original 78.0 kB
  • After minification 78.0 kB
  • After compression 56.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 16.0 kB
  • After minification 16.0 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Babyinabag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Baby Inabag. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

babyinabag.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

babyinabag.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

babyinabag.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Babyinabag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Babyinabag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Baby Inabag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: