Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

bannedproject.com

Renew kitchen

Page Load Speed

39.7 sec in total

First Response

4.7 sec

Resources Loaded

8.8 sec

Page Rendered

26.2 sec

About Website

Welcome to bannedproject.com homepage info - get ready to check Bannedproject best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bannedproject.com

Don't replace your kitchen, renew it. Make your kitchen and beautiful again.

Visit bannedproject.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bannedproject.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.7 sec and then it took 35 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bannedproject.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.158

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bannedproject.com

4741 ms

font-awesome.min.css

184 ms

nucleus.css

265 ms

xenon_61.css

407 ms

bootstrap-gantry.css

339 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Bannedproject.com, 24% (18 requests) were made to Justagirlandherblog.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Bannedproject.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 831.0 kB (16%)

Content Size

5.1 MB

After Optimization

4.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Bannedproject.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 168.8 kB

  • Original 224.3 kB
  • After minification 203.0 kB
  • After compression 55.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 168.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 4.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bannedproject images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 182.2 kB

  • Original 249.2 kB
  • After minification 219.4 kB
  • After compression 67.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 182.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 469.5 kB

  • Original 527.7 kB
  • After minification 349.8 kB
  • After compression 58.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bannedproject.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 469.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (20%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

55

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bannedproject. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bannedproject.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bannedproject.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bannedproject.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bannedproject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bannedproject.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bannedproject. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: