Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

bar61.com

Spanish Tapas Restaurant London - Bar 61 - No 7 On Tripadvisor

Page Load Speed

43.6 sec in total

First Response

4.1 sec

Resources Loaded

38.8 sec

Page Rendered

749 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bar 61 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bar61.com

Bar 61 is a multi-award winning Spanish tapas restaurant. Established 17 years. Rated No 7 on Trip Advisor for all restaurants in the UK.

Visit bar61.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bar61.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.1 sec and then it took 39.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bar61.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value12.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value31.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value26.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,390 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value30.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.bar61.com

4132 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

211 ms

style.min.css

446 ms

classic-themes.min.css

192 ms

styles.css

196 ms

Our browser made a total of 219 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (142 requests) were addressed to the original Bar61.com, 19% (41 requests) were made to Assets-www.prod.quandoo.com and 9% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (16.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Bar61.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 10.0 MB (72%)

Content Size

14.0 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bar61.com main page is 14.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 166.8 kB

  • Original 194.6 kB
  • After minification 180.2 kB
  • After compression 27.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 166.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 7.8 MB

  • Original 9.9 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bar 61 needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.8 MB or 79% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 996.2 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB
  • After compression 1.7 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 996.2 kB or 37% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 139.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bar61.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 126 (65%)

Requests Now

193

After Optimization

67

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 193 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bar 61. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 102 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

bar61.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bar61.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bar61.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bar61.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bar61.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bar 61. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: