Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

beautyshop1.com

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

302 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

443 ms

About Website

Visit beautyshop1.com now to see the best up-to-date Beautyshop 1 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beautyshop1.com

Beauty Shop 1 provides professional skin care, hair care, and makeup for men & women, from top brands like Youngblood, Thalgo, Dermalogica, Guinot, & Pelactiv.

Visit beautyshop1.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Beautyshop1.com page load time and found that the first response time was 302 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beautyshop1.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

beautyshop1.com

302 ms

beautyshop1.com

579 ms

css

202 ms

styles.css

220 ms

styles.css

354 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Beautyshop1.com, 34% (30 requests) were made to Cdn2.bigcommerce.com and 29% (26 requests) were made to Cdn9.bigcommerce.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (875 ms) relates to the external source Cdn2.bigcommerce.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 171.5 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

898.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beautyshop1.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 779.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 60.8 kB

  • Original 74.5 kB
  • After minification 66.9 kB
  • After compression 13.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 56.0 kB

  • Original 779.2 kB
  • After minification 723.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beautyshop 1 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 48.6 kB

  • Original 195.5 kB
  • After minification 195.4 kB
  • After compression 146.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.6 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 20.4 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautyshop1.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (59%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beautyshop 1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

beautyshop1.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

beautyshop1.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

beautyshop1.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautyshop1.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Beautyshop1.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beautyshop 1. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: