Access behindthescenes.net. Behind the Scenes Travel

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,060 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

behindthescenes-travel.com

80 ms

_DYLYpp7tq2pX0LNFobe5rPvwoSlW28cLEyOOm0pjcXfeCCIfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9ujRbaZAIXZQsKw2MUjQmRwRMuwRMtwy7nMkG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCHKoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8if37OcBDOcu8OfG0SaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdP37O1m0Ze8DjhNhZW48ZfuTieBC-AI0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0dcmXOeBDOcu8Oe48-e80ZYsGZWFRZAo8SkuXScBhZA30jhNlOeUzjhBC-eNDifUDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOYm0Ze8DjhNhZW48ZfuTieBC-AI0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOYiaikoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUaiaS0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80Zko0ZWbCiaiaOcBDOcu8OYiaikoKZAyTdcsX-emDjhm0ZWwliY4yicmCOcFzdPUaiaS0SaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUaiaS0iAoq-WFRdaZ8ScmqOA8XjAUTjPoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXK2YgkdayTdAIldcNhjPG4fHCgIMMjMPMfH6qJtKGbMg62JMJ7fbKzMsMMeMb6MKG4fH3gIMMjfkMfH6qJK3IbMg6YJMJ7fbKTMsMMeM66MKG4f5w7IMMj2PMfH6qJCMIbMg65JMJ7fbKwMsMMegI6MTMgNvrJGbj.js

71 ms

css2

70 ms

legacy.js

60 ms

modern.js

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Behindthescenes.net, 28% (9 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (240 ms) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Behindthescenes.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 50.0 kB

Original 61.8 kB
After minification 55.1 kB
After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Behind The Scenes images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

Original 975.8 kB
After minification 975.8 kB
After compression 971.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Behind The Scenes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.