Access benabar.com. Des petits bars au star-system : une biographie de Bénabar

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,650 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.2 s

1/100

10%

283 ms

gppstub.js

74 ms

boise.js

90 ms

abilene.js

106 ms

et.js

121 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Benabar.com, 20% (16 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com and 15% (12 requests) were made to Ezojs.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (951 ms) relates to the external source Youtube.com.

Content Size

696.7 kB

After Optimization

484.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Benabar.com main page is 696.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 252.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 192.3 kB

Original 252.3 kB
After minification 241.3 kB
After compression 59.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 192.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

Original 169.2 kB
After minification 152.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Benabar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

Original 159.6 kB
After minification 159.6 kB
After compression 157.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

Original 115.6 kB
After minification 115.6 kB
After compression 114.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Benabar.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Benabar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.