Access bestaquatic.com. Swim Facility Management and Education | Best Aquatic Management

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.125

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

85/100

10%

bestaquatic.com

112 ms

gtm.js

69 ms

jquery.min.js

28 ms

jquery-migrate-1.4.1.min.js

28 ms

skin.css

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Bestaquatic.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Googleadservices.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (261 ms) relates to the external source S7.addthis.com.

Content Size

683.6 kB

After Optimization

578.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Bestaquatic.com main page is 683.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 399.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 42.3 kB

Original 53.9 kB
After minification 49.2 kB
After compression 11.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

Original 399.7 kB
After minification 380.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Best Aquatic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 38.4 kB

Original 206.1 kB
After minification 205.7 kB
After compression 167.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.4 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

Original 23.9 kB
After minification 23.7 kB
After compression 17.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestaquatic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Aquatic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.