Access bestmark.ma. Bestmark - Connectons-nous! Pc portable, Smarpthone, Apple ...

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.459

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

bestmark.ma

239 ms

bestmark.ma

320 ms

calendar.min.css

170 ms

styles-m.min.css

224 ms

uppy-custom.min.css

189 ms

Our browser made a total of 159 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (156 requests) were addressed to the original Bestmark.ma, 1% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bestmark.ma.

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Bestmark.ma main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 423.2 kB

Original 465.6 kB
After minification 463.3 kB
After compression 42.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 423.2 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 87.7 kB

Original 2.2 MB
After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestmark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 177.6 kB

Original 1.0 MB
After minification 1.0 MB
After compression 867.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 177.6 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 42.1 kB

Original 174.4 kB
After minification 174.4 kB
After compression 132.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestmark.ma needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Now

156

After Optimization

The browser has sent 156 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.