Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

bestshocker.ru

Электрошокеры купить в Санкт-Петербурге | Магазин средств самообороны, цены

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

469 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

409 ms

About Website

Welcome to bestshocker.ru homepage info - get ready to check Bestshocker best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about bestshocker.ru

Электрошокеры и средств самообороны купить у компании Bestshocker в Санкт-Петербурге ★ Интернет-магазин электрошокеров для самозащиты ★ Доступна доставка товаров по городу и области ★ Широкий выбор ЭШ...

Visit bestshocker.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestshocker.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 469 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestshocker.ru performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,770 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.7 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestshocker.ru

469 ms

bestshocker.ru

1088 ms

core.css

317 ms

page_17e02ca21d564b5429644ee41f9d396e_v1.css

335 ms

template_3822c7ea70728cdc7e5fe508b39fe449_v1.css

742 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Bestshocker.ru, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Bitrix.info. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bestshocker.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 464.0 kB (18%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestshocker.ru main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 279.1 kB

  • Original 319.5 kB
  • After minification 256.6 kB
  • After compression 40.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 62.9 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 279.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 31.9 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestshocker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 102.8 kB

  • Original 575.1 kB
  • After minification 575.0 kB
  • After compression 472.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.8 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 50.2 kB

  • Original 145.9 kB
  • After minification 145.9 kB
  • After compression 95.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestshocker.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.2 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (25%)

Requests Now

102

After Optimization

76

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestshocker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

bestshocker.ru accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bestshocker.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

bestshocker.ru SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestshocker.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestshocker.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bestshocker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: