Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

bicepp.org

Home - Business & Industry Council for Emergency Planning & Preparedness

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

47 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

About Website

Visit bicepp.org now to see the best up-to-date Bicepp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bicepp.org

To provide a forum for information exchange to enhance emergency preparedness and contingency planning within the business community.

Visit bicepp.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Bicepp.org page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bicepp.org performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,250 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bicepp.org

47 ms

bicepp.org

63 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

5 ms

common_ui.css

9 ms

widget.css

13 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Bicepp.org, 27% (28 requests) were made to Images.clubexpress.com and 17% (18 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (906 ms) relates to the external source Images.clubexpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 319.5 kB (3%)

Content Size

10.5 MB

After Optimization

10.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Bicepp.org main page is 10.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 9.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 92.2 kB

  • Original 114.4 kB
  • After minification 113.8 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 9.9 MB
  • After minification 9.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bicepp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 208.0 kB

  • Original 423.4 kB
  • After minification 416.4 kB
  • After compression 215.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 208.0 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 41.0 kB
  • After minification 40.6 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bicepp.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (53%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bicepp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bicepp.org accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

bicepp.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bicepp.org SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bicepp.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bicepp.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bicepp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: