Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

bigtuna.com

Big Tuna | Small Business Web Site Design & Digital Marketing | Big Tuna Web

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

101 ms

Resources Loaded

813 ms

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Big Tuna content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bigtuna.com

Big Tuna specializes in Responsive Website Design, Search Engine Optimization, AdWords Marketing, Hosting & Email to Businesses, Startups, and Entrepreneurs.

Visit bigtuna.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bigtuna.com page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bigtuna.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,310 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.346

32/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bigtuna.com

101 ms

bigtuna.com

226 ms

bigtuna_424649c43f810a69690a509fcc507921.css

31 ms

css

115 ms

bigtuna_single_bb58ece6807febdbbbb49e86c05dc1b8.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Bigtuna.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to D1ajyp3swh7ygp.cloudfront.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (237 ms) belongs to the original domain Bigtuna.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 238.0 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

918.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bigtuna.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 559.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 236.6 kB

  • Original 294.1 kB
  • After minification 293.9 kB
  • After compression 57.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 236.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 156.3 kB
  • After minification 156.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Big Tuna images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 559.0 kB
  • After minification 559.0 kB
  • After compression 557.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 257 B

  • Original 147.2 kB
  • After minification 147.2 kB
  • After compression 146.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bigtuna.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (63%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Big Tuna. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

bigtuna.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bigtuna.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

bigtuna.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bigtuna.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bigtuna.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Big Tuna. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: