Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

bigtunaweb.com

Big Tuna | Small Business Web Site Design & Digital Marketing | Big Tuna Web

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

104 ms

Resources Loaded

887 ms

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

About Website

Visit bigtunaweb.com now to see the best up-to-date Big Tuna Web content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bigtunaweb.com

Big Tuna specializes in Responsive Website Design, Search Engine Optimization, AdWords Marketing, Hosting & Email to Businesses, Startups, and Entrepreneurs.

Visit bigtunaweb.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bigtunaweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bigtunaweb.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,340 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.215

58/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bigtunaweb.com

104 ms

bigtuna.com

250 ms

bigtuna_bc023c2e06a2b12a6737e64e25d2a3a9.css

44 ms

css

91 ms

bigtuna_single_bb58ece6807febdbbbb49e86c05dc1b8.css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bigtunaweb.com, 63% (26 requests) were made to Bigtuna.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to D1ajyp3swh7ygp.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (279 ms) relates to the external source Bigtuna.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 238.2 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

914.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bigtunaweb.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 555.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 236.9 kB

  • Original 294.5 kB
  • After minification 294.3 kB
  • After compression 57.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 236.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 156.3 kB
  • After minification 156.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Big Tuna Web images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 555.0 kB
  • After minification 555.0 kB
  • After compression 553.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 263 B

  • Original 147.3 kB
  • After minification 147.3 kB
  • After compression 147.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bigtunaweb.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (65%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Big Tuna Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

bigtunaweb.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bigtunaweb.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

bigtunaweb.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bigtunaweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bigtunaweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Big Tuna Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: