Access bigwebtechnologies.com. Website Design & Development Company Gurgaon Big Web Technologies

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

bigwebtechnologies.com

920 ms

aos.css

83 ms

bootstrap.min.css

262 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

187 ms

boxicons.min.css

191 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Bigwebtechnologies.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (920 ms) belongs to the original domain Bigwebtechnologies.com.

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Bigwebtechnologies.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 30.9 kB

Original 37.0 kB
After minification 30.6 kB
After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 378.0 kB

Original 1.6 MB
After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Big Web Technologies needs image optimization as it can save up to 378.0 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 35.5 kB

Original 130.6 kB
After minification 130.6 kB
After compression 95.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

Original 94.8 kB
After minification 94.8 kB
After compression 70.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bigwebtechnologies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Big Web Technologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.