Access bluelambda.com. Bluelambda | Full-scale Growth for Your eCommerce Business

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,220 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

bluelambda.com

44 ms

bluelambda.com

46 ms

www.bluelambda.com

527 ms

bluelambda-588a82.webflow.cd2052cff.css

92 ms

webfont.js

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Bluelambda.com, 34% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 28% (20 requests) were made to Assets-global.website-files.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (638 ms) relates to the external source Uploads-ssl.webflow.com.

Content Size

717.5 kB

After Optimization

644.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Bluelambda.com main page is 717.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 376.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 29.6 kB

Original 38.7 kB
After minification 38.1 kB
After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 40.1 kB

Original 277.1 kB
After minification 237.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bluelambda needs image optimization as it can save up to 40.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

Original 376.2 kB
After minification 376.2 kB
After compression 374.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

Original 25.5 kB
After minification 25.5 kB
After compression 23.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bluelambda.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bluelambda. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.