Access bluevigil.com. Autonomous Aerial Light for Nighttime Work Zones

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value28.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,080 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.3 s

0/100

10%

www.bluevigil.com

68 ms

autoptimize_ec87df471d7d8e31190dacc1659c3c70.css

28 ms

js

91 ms

c6bea42680bbb13157e587ce616cc3dc.min.css

138 ms

jquery.min.js

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Bluevigil.com, 12% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (397 ms) belongs to the original domain Bluevigil.com.

Content Size

5.7 MB

After Optimization

5.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Bluevigil.com main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 94.4 kB

Original 113.0 kB
After minification 113.0 kB
After compression 18.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 140.8 kB

Original 4.5 MB
After minification 4.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bluevigil images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 104.7 kB

Original 872.8 kB
After minification 872.8 kB
After compression 768.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 104.7 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 790 B

Original 245.5 kB
After minification 245.5 kB
After compression 244.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bluevigil.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bluevigil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.