Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

boldmarkup.com

Website Design and Development, Graphic Design Services, Bulk SMS Marketing | Boldmarkup Ventures

Page Load Speed

15.2 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

13.8 sec

Page Rendered

385 ms

About Website

Welcome to boldmarkup.com homepage info - get ready to check Boldmarkup best content right away, or after learning these important things about boldmarkup.com

Website Design and Development, Graphic Design Services, Bulk SMS Marketing | Boldmarkup Ventures

Visit boldmarkup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Boldmarkup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 14.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

boldmarkup.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

boldmarkup.com

1025 ms

boldmarkup.com

1833 ms

updated.css

2133 ms

jquery.min.js

2553 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

1825 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Boldmarkup.com, 11% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Boldmarkup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.0 kB (2%)

Content Size

950.7 kB

After Optimization

932.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Boldmarkup.com main page is 950.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 932.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

  • Original 18.7 kB
  • After minification 16.3 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 932.0 kB
  • After minification 927.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Boldmarkup images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (39%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Boldmarkup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

boldmarkup.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

boldmarkup.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

boldmarkup.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Boldmarkup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Boldmarkup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Boldmarkup. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: