Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

brandingdavid.com

副業データベース

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

273 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Brandingdavid content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about brandingdavid.com

Combipack of mifepristone misoprostol price is the best product for pregnant women. Doctors' advice on their use and contraindications for girls

Visit brandingdavid.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Brandingdavid.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

brandingdavid.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value950 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.04

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

brandingdavid.com

1282 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

53 ms

style.min.css

49 ms

styles.css

57 ms

css

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Brandingdavid.com, 18% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Brandingdavid.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 359.0 kB (78%)

Content Size

458.6 kB

After Optimization

99.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Brandingdavid.com main page is 458.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 221.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 65.9 kB

  • Original 88.7 kB
  • After minification 86.6 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 165.6 kB

  • Original 221.5 kB
  • After minification 178.8 kB
  • After compression 55.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 165.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 127.5 kB

  • Original 148.4 kB
  • After minification 126.8 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brandingdavid.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 127.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (88%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brandingdavid. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

brandingdavid.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

brandingdavid.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

brandingdavid.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brandingdavid.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Brandingdavid.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: