Access broxton.com. Precision Machined Components | Sheet Metalwork

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.057

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

www.broxton.com

592 ms

style.min.css

75 ms

styles.css

149 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

223 ms

style.css

233 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Broxton.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Static.hotjar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (645 ms) belongs to the original domain Broxton.com.

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Broxton.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 58.5 kB

Original 71.6 kB
After minification 62.1 kB
After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.6 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 92.6 kB

Original 2.2 MB
After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Broxton images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

Original 109.0 kB
After minification 109.0 kB
After compression 106.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

Original 83.2 kB
After minification 82.7 kB
After compression 81.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Broxton.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Broxton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.