Access bubbabambu.com.

bubbabambu.com

234 ms

C558B9EC-5E13-48C1-84E2-CE6D4E8317AD

522 ms

11EIQ5IGqaL._RC%7C01ZTHTZObnL.css,41C-I1lXVwL.css,31ufSReDtSL.css,013z33uKh2L.css,017DsKjNQJL.css,0131vqwP5UL.css,41EWOOlBJ9L.css,11TIuySqr6L.css,01ElnPiDxWL.css,11Qjwq-j69L.css,01Dm5eKVxwL.css,01IdKcBuAdL.css,01y-XAlI+2L.css,21P6CS3L9LL.css,01oDR3IULNL.css,41CYNGpGlrL.css,01XPHJk60-L.css,01smHc51S9L.css,21aPhFy+riL.css,11gneA3MtJL.css,21fecG8pUzL.css,01ulGzBW88L.css,01CFUgsA-YL.css,31C80IiXalL.css,11qour3ND0L.css,11gKCCKQV+L.css,11061HxnEvL.css,11oHt2HYxnL.css,01uPgw4sNAL.css,11JQtnL-6eL.css,116v6uYvN6L.css,11jtXRmppwL.css,01QrWuRrZ-L.css,21zuRztKjtL.css,11QyqG8yiqL.css,11K24eOJg4L.css,11F2+OBzLyL.css,01890+Vwk8L.css,11Y05DTEL6L.css,01cbS3UK11L.css,21F85am0yFL.css,01giMEP+djL.css_.css

19 ms

01C10v4TaxL.css

40 ms

41H4XraWzVL._RC%7C71jiDgeH7aL.css,41HNloh9E4L.css,01Dz-1wiEYL.css,017quQ2WSdL.css,31F9VldP5OL.css,31YZpDCYJPL.css,21MKjoYL8wL.css,41yQj5y2obL.css,01yCq3WXEcL.css,11EwMr28-QL.css,31OvHRW+XiL.css,01XHMOHpK1L.css,11iUHDm4--L.css,415g7iDx4VL.css,01YWmXMYw8L.css_.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bubbabambu.com, 53% (16 requests) were made to Images-eu.ssl-images-amazon.com and 37% (11 requests) were made to M.media-amazon.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (522 ms) relates to the external source Amazon.co.uk.

Content Size

542.7 kB

After Optimization

348.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Bubbabambu.com main page is 542.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 272.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 188.0 kB

Original 272.9 kB
After minification 266.6 kB
After compression 84.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 188.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

Original 175.1 kB
After minification 169.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bubbabambu images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 477 B

Original 36.8 kB
After minification 36.8 kB
After compression 36.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 236 B

Original 57.8 kB
After minification 57.8 kB
After compression 57.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bubbabambu.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bubbabambu. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.